Abu v. Asya
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court ordered the Munsiff Court at Ottapalam to furnish copies of specific orders to the petitioner within three days and deferred further proceedings in the underlying suit for two weeks to allow the petitioner time to challenge the orders.
What did the court decide?
Furnish copies of orders to petitioner within three days; further proceedings in O.S. No.275/2015 deferred for two weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939
OP(C).No. 393 of 2018 ------------------OS. NO.275/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM.
PETITIONER(S) -------------
ABU, 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE MOIDUKUTTY @ MOIDUTTY, KULAVARKUNNATH HOUSE, MARAYAMANGALAM AMSOM, DESOM AND POST, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.SREEHARI SRI.SACHIN VYAS.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. ASYA, 42 YEARS, D/O LATE VEERAN. 2. MUHAMMEDALI @ MUTHA, 52 YEARS, S/O SAID. 3. KHADER @ MANU, 54 YEARS, S/O SAID. 4. NOUFAL, 23 YEARS, S/O KHADER. 5. POKKER @ KUTTYPOKKER, 50 YEARS, S/O MUHAMMEDKUTTY. 6. RAFEEK, 22 YEARS, S/O. SAIDALIKUTTY. ALL ARE RESIDING AT KULAVARKUNNATH, MARAYAMANGALAM AMSOM, DESOM AND POST, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679 356.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Munsiff Court should furnish copies of certain orders to the petitioner within three days.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abu
- respondent
Asya
Coram
Alexander Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court