Sajeev v. Baiju
Case brief
What is this about?
In this original petition under Article 227, the High Court of Kerala directed the Sub Court, Alappuzha to promptly consider a pending application for extension of time to pay costs, ensuring both parties have a reasonable opportunity to be heard without further delay.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Sub Court to consider the pending application for time extension for payment of costs within two weeks after affording an opportunity of hearing to both parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939
OP(C).No. 124 of 2018
OS 59/2014 of SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA
-------
PETITIONER/DEFENDANT :
SAJEEV, S/O. VASUDEVAN, LANGARA VEEDU, RAMANKARI VILLAGE, RAMANKARI P.O., ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADVS.SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM SMT.V.T.LITHA SMT.SUNANDA SUKUMARAN SRI.RENI JOHN SMT.SHRUTHI SARA JACOB
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
BAIJU, S/O. SARAMMA, PUTHEN CHIRAYIL, THEKKEKKARA P.O., THEKKEKKARA MURI, CHAMBAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA - 690 107.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court under Article 227 should direct the trial court to expedite consideration of an application seeking extension of time for payment of costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sajeef, S/o. Vasudevam, Langara Veedu
- respondent
Baiju, S/o. Saramma
Coram
Alexander Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court