The High Court of Kerala dismissed a matrimonial appeal on 22-02-2018. The dismissal was due to default because counsel submitted there was no instruction from the appellant.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1939
Mat.Appeal.No. 68 of 2007
JUDGMENT IN OP 128/2006 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM ============
APPELLANT/PETITIONER
MANNEN KUNNATH SUBRAMANINAN, AGED 38 YEARS S/O.VELAYUDHAN, TIRUR TALUK, KALPAKANCHERY AMSOM, DESOM, MANDAYAPURAM PADI,KALPAKANCHERRY PO.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SMT.A.R.DIVYA
SMT.R.MEERA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
MOOTHATT RUGMINI, AGED 50 YEARS, D/O.VELAYUDHAN, KONDAMKODUVATH HOUSE, PONMUNDAM AMSOM, VALLATHUR DESOM, PONMUNDAM PO., TIRUR TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.)
SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS
SRIC.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SD
K.HARILAL
&
A.M.BABU, JJ.
MAT Appeal No. 68 of 2007
Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
HARILAL, J
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no instruction from the party. In view of the above submission, this Mat appeal will stand dismissed for default.
Sd/K.HARILAL , JUDGE
Sd/A.M.BABU, JUDGE
AMV/22/02/2018
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
Mannen Kunnath Subramaninan
Moottath Rugmini
K. Harilal
A. M. Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
