N.P.Ummer v. Maimoona V.V.
Case brief
What is this about?
Perfecting this matrimonial matter finally heard on 22-02-2018. Counsel submitted the matter was settled out of court. The appeal and revision petition were dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Matrimonial Appeal No. 142 of 2007 and R.P.(FC) No. 240 of 2006 dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1939
Mat.Appeal.No. 142 of 2007
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04-08-2006 IN OP NO.51/2006 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
N.P.UMMER, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED @ BAPPUTTY HAJI, NADUVILPEEDIYEKKAL P.O., TIRUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN
SRI.G.SUDHEER (THURAVOOR)
RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONER:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N.P. Ummar
- respondent
Maimoona V.V.
Coram
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court