The High Court of Kerala granted permission to withdraw a matrimonial appeal instituted by Anoutha Chandan against a decision of the Family Court at Tirur. The appeal was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with permission granted to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
FRIDAY ,THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1940
Mat.Appeal.No. 537 of 2016
O.P.NO.519/2015 of FAMILY COURT, TIRUR, DATED 21-03-2016
APPELLANT/2ND PETITIONER:
ANOOTHA CHANDRAN, AGED 31 YEARS, D/O.T.P.CHANDRAN,'DARSANA', THEKKUMMURI P.O.,TRIKKANDIYUR VILLAGE, TIRUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA - 676 105.
BY ADVS. SMT.MEENA.A. SRI.K.C.KIRAN SRI.M.DEVESH SRI.SAJU.S.A SRI.VINAY MATHEW JOSEPH SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH
RESPONDENT/1ST PETITIONER:
D.B.R. PRABHU, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.V.DHANAPALAN,38/73, 2, BROWN NEST APARTMENT, II MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, ADAYAR,CHENNAI - 600 020. (PRESENT ADDRESS: DBR PRABU, S/O. RETD. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN,NO.17, KRISHNAMACHARI AVENUE,ADAYAR, CHENNAI - 600 020.)
BY ADV. SMT.N.DEEPA
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mat.Appeal.No. 537 of 2016 : 2 :
JUDGMENT
C.K.Abdul Rehim, J.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Matrimonial Appeal on the basis that issues between the parties have been settled out of court.
Permission granted. The above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Bb
Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE Sd/- T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE [True copy]
P.A to Judge
ANOOTHA CHANDRAN
D.B.R. PRABHU
C.K.ABDUL REHIM
T.V.ANILKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
