Revision petition challenging compensation quantum for land acquisition for electric line. Court remanded matter considering market value and tree yield evidence.
Impugned order set aside; matter remanded to court below for de novo disposal following principles in C.R.P. No.144 of 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1940 CRP.No. 414 of 2018
O.P.(ELE).77/2010 of 1ST ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, KOZHIKODE
REVISION PETITIONER /PETITIONER :
SHAJU GEORGE, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. GEORGE, RESIDING AT PALAKKAT HOUSE, POST KUPPAYAKODE, ENGAPUZHA VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS :
THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., POST AREEKODE, UGRAPURAM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM-673639.
BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-07-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
EL
26.7.2018
SATHISH NINAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C. R. P. No.414 of 2018 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of July, 2018
O R D E R
Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded in respect of the drawing of MysoreKozhikode 400 KV electric line, the land ownerclimant is in revision.
C. R. P. No.414 of 2018
:- 2 :-
value. As held by this Court in the order dated 07.03.2017 in C.R.P. No.144/2013 and connected cases, the determination of land value cannot be solely based upon the fair value as fixed by the revenue authorities. The market value will have to be independently considered and arrived at by the court. As regards the yield from the trees, the respondent was guided by the schedule prepared by the Agricultural Department. This Court in the order in C.R.P. No.144 of 2013 (above referred to) has held that the question of yield from the trees is to be considered based on evidence. In paragraphs 9 and 10 of the said order this Court observed thus:
“9. This Court is of the view that this matter
has to be remitted back to the court below to
consider the following aspects;
i. Yield revealed from each tree in the land
belonged to each of the petitioners.
ii. Determination of the diminishing land value,
after ascertaining the market value and any other
C. R. P. No.414 of 2018
:- 3 :-
component relating to the assessment.
of the court below any other aspect, which has not been considered while determining the diminution value of the land. Parties are at liberty to adduce fresh evidence.”
The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the court below for disposal denovo. The directions given in the order dated 07.03.2017 in C.R.P. No.144 of 2013 and connected cases shall be read as part of this order. Parties to appear in the court below on 05.09.2018.
Sd/SATHISH NINAN JUDGE
kns/-
//True Copy//
P.S. to Judge
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the quantum of compensation for land acquisition involving electric line drawing is adequate.
Whether land value determination should be based on revenue fair value or independent market value.
Whether yield compensation for trees must be based on evidence or prepared schedules.
Shaju George
The Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
