The Original Petition was dismissed because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter is not pressed and there were no opposing arguments recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 26TH ASHADHA, 1940
OP(C).No. 103 of 2012
E.P.41/2010 IN OS 160/1997 OF MUNSIFF - MAGISTRATE COURT, MANNARKAD.
PETITIONER:
VALLIKKUTTY, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O CHAMI, CHERUMPADATH HOUSE, CHETHALLUR AMSOM AND DESOM, MANNARKKAD TALUK.
BY ADV.SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD)
RESPONDENT:
C. NARAYANIKUTTY @ AMMINI, AGED 61 YEARS, D/O. THACHU EZHUTHASSAN, CHETHALLUR AMSOM AND DESOM, MANNARKAD TALUK, PIN - 678 582.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-07-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
18.07.2018.
SATHISH NINAN, J.
....................
O.P.(C) No. 103 of 2012
.................................
Dated this the 17th day of July, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the matter is not pressed. Recording the above submission, this Original Petition (Civil) is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE
AMV/17/07/2018
/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE
Vallikkutty
C. Narayanikutty @ Ammini
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
