Allowed

Vishnu v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC11 Apr 2018Crl.MC/2099/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Kerala allowed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings for offences involving criminal conspiracy, riot, assault, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court was satisfied that the dispute had been settled, no public interest was involved, and there was no impediment to the prayer.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceedings in Crime No. 2560 of 2017 are quashed. Any material objects produced shall be disposed of by the learned Magistrate.

Vishnu Vs State of Kerala — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1940

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 2099 of 2018

¶6

CRIME NO.2560/2017 OF PANDALAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶7

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

¶8

VISHNU M., S/O.MURALIDHARAN PILLAI, PLAVILA THEKKE PUTHENVEEDU, NADAUKKUNNU, CHENGAMANADU P.O., KOTTARAKKARA-691506.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.RENJIT GEORGE

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & CW1:

¶11

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. 2. ARUN RAJ, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, PLAVUNILKUNNATHIL THEKKETHIL, NEAR SNDP MANDIRAM, MUTTAR, MANGARAM MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689645. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.R. RENJITH R2 BY ADV. SRI.R.N.SANDEEP

¶12

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

mbr/

¶14

Crl.MC.No. 2099 of 2018 ()

¶15

APPENDIX

¶16

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

¶17

ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.2560/2017 OF PANDALAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. ANNEXURE A2 AN AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT STATING THE SETTLEMENT OF ALL THE DISPUTES.

¶18

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL ----------------------

/TRUE COPY/

P.S.TO JUDGE

mbr/ 12.04.2018.

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW J.

¶23

Crl.M.C.No.2099 of 2018

¶24

Dated this the 11^th day of April, 2018

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶27

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.2560 of 2017 of Pandalam Police

¶28

Station in which the allegation is that he has committed the offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324 and 326 read with 149 IPC. The second respondent is the victim. It is submitted that the matter has been settled and the proceedings in the trial court may be quashed.

¶29

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶30

I have perused the affidavit filed by the second respondent, who has appeared through counsel. I am satisfied that the allegation is true and no public interest is involved. There is no impediment for allowing the prayer of the petitioner.

¶31

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in Crime No.2560 of 2017 of Pandalam Police Station are quashed. If any material objects have been produced in the case, the learned Magistrate may pass appropriate orders for their disposal.

¶32

Sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE

¶33

cms

¶34

/True copy/

¶35

P.S.to Judge

Vishnu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohanan Vs State of Kerala

Sandeep Vs Vipin P.G.

G. Krishnakumar Vs State of Kerala

Tallish Vs State of Kerala

Javid E.P Vs State of Kerala

Pascal Ekemona @ John Kennedy Vs the State of Kerala