Sandeep v. Vipin P.G.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging cheque bounce proceedings under Sections 406, 420, 468 IPC refiled after EOW. Court allowed quash filing on settlement and no public interest.
What did the court decide?
Quashing of proceedings in Crime No.1888 of 2016 filed against petitioners.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 1363 of 2018
----------------------
CRIME NO. 1888/2016 OF KAZHAKUTTAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT RE-REGISTERED AS CBCID CRIME NO. 64/CR/EOW/TVM17
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 & 2
1 SANDEEP JAYASREE SREEDHARAN NAIR, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. V. SREEDHARAN NAIR, 'JAYASREE', HOUSE NO.76, RANNI LANE, VAZHAYILA, PEROORKADA P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2 YASHIN JALAL AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. JALALUDEEN ABDUL RAZAK, 'JALALS', T.C. 2/1155 (9), PALOOR LANE, MURINJAPALAM, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 420 and 468 IPC should be quashed in view of the settlement between parties.
What is the public interest in non-comparison cheque disputes?
Whether a private dispute can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SANDEEP JAYASREE SREEDHARAN NAIR
- petitioner
YASHIN JALAL
- respondent
VIPIN P.G.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court