Sulaiman v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 16TH MAGHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 1547 of 2015
VC 2/2015/SIU.1 of ENQ.COMMR. & SPL.JUDGE,TRIVANDRUM
PETITIONER(S)/2ND ACCUSED
SULAIMAN SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.N.MANU THAMPI
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2018, ALONG WITH CRL.M.C.6258/2016. THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
6258 of 2016
O R D E R
When these matters have been taken up for hearing,
the learned counsel for the petitioners has requested for granting permission to withdraw these Crl.M.Cs. Permission stands granted. Accordingly, these Crl.M.Cs. stand dismissed as withdrawn.
However, this order will not stand in the way of the petitioners in challenging the final report, in accordance with law. Needless to state that the investigation in Crime
Crl.M.C 1547 of 2015 & 6258 of 2016
-: 2 :-
No-VC.2/2015/SIU-1, Thiruvananthapuram, shall not be a bar in considering the promotion of the petitioner in
Crl.M.C. No.1547 of 2015, if he is otherwise eligible.
sd
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE
dl/5.2.18
SULAIMAN SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
STATE OF KERALA
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court