Narayana Menon @ Unni v. K.Mohammad Y Safirulla
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the Court held that since the District Collector passed an order in favor of the petitioner based on prior directives, no reason existed to proceed with contempt proceedings. The Court closed the case, leaving the petitioner's remedy to proceed for non-passing of consequential orders by respondents.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 981 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 39926/2016 DATED 16-12-2016
PETITIONER
NARAYANA MENON @ UNNI, AGED 78 YEARS, SON OF LATE KRISHNA MENON, PARAPPILLIL HOUSE, THIRUVANKULAM AND NOW RESIDING AT CHALIYATHU HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, TRIPUNITHURA.
BY ADV.SRI.JOSE TOM C. KANDATHIL
RESPONDENTS:
1. K.MOHAMMAD Y SAFIRULLA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 030
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's complaint of non-compliance with court directives warrants contempt proceedings.
Whether consequential orders requiring action against respondents consequent to Annexure A2 can be enforced in this contempt case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narayana Menon @ Unni
- respondent
K.Mohammad Y Safirulla
- respondent
R. Radhika
- respondent
Lekha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court