Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with earlier directives was admitted; counsel confirmed compliance, leading to closure with no further pursuit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 973 of 2018 IN WPC. 36643/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 36643/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15-01-2018
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
ELDHOSE K.G., AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.GEEVARGHESE, KAKKATTIL HOUSE, NORTH MAZHUVANNUR, IRAPURAM P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683541.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE SRI.K.S.SUMEESH SRI.T.ANCY SMT.NIVYA VALSAN SMT.N.B.FATHIMA SULFATH
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1 :
SRI. AJITHKUMAR I.AS., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 973 of 2018 IN WPC. 36643/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.01.2018 IN WP(C)NO.36643/2017 ANNEXURE B: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.03.2018 IN CONT.CASE(C)NO.388/2018
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL -----------------------
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk/21/6/18
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C)No.973 of 2018
in
W.P(C)No.36643 of 2017
Dated this the 20th day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining
that the directives contained in the judgment dated 15.01.2018
are not complied with.
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel submitted that already the directives are complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case
any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/20/6/18
ELDHOSE K.G.
SRI. AJITHKUMAR I.AS.
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
