Petitioner complained that directives in a previous judgment were not complied with. The court observed that the petitioner submitted directives were already complied with and closed the contempt case accordingly.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 29TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 943 of 2018 IN WPC. 28764/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28764/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 02-02-2018
PETITIONER(S):
ANTONY C.C AGED 69 YEARS, S/O. CHUMMAR, CHERUVATHOOR HOUSE, KUNNAMKULAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.RAJIT
RESPONDENT(S):
BHASID BAHULAEYAN AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE DEPUTY RANGE OFFICER, ERUMAPETTY FOREST RANGE,ERUMAPETTY.-680331
R1 BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.SANDESH RAJA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 943 of 2018 IN WPC. 28764/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURES A: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMETN DATED 2.2.2018 IN WP(C)NO.28764/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT
ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF ANX-A & B BY THE RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk/19/6/18
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C). No.943 of 2018
in
W.P(C)No.28764 of 2017
Dated this the 19th day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining
that the directives contained in the judgment dated 2.2.2018 are
not complied with.
the petitioner submitted that the directives are already complied
with . Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt
case any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/19/6/18
Antony C.C.
Bhasid Bahulayan
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
