Anoop D v. C M Gopinathan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition against non-compliance of a judgment. The court observed that the respondent had produced an order showing compliance, although belated, and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 92 of 2018 IN WP(C). 5013/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 5013/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-03-2017
PETITIONER/S:
ANOOP D, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O DHARANEEDHARAN, ETTA HOUSE, PUTHIYATHERU GANAPATHIL MANDAPAM ROAD, CHIRAKKAL POST,KANNUR-II, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH SRI.K.P.ANTONY BINU
RESPONDENT/S:
C M GOPINATHAN, WORKING AS DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LAND TRIBUNAL) KANNUR, KANNUR PO. [SUBSTITUED] [GEETHA P, AGED 54 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), WORKING AS DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND REFORMS) KANNUR, KANNUR P.O. RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED AS PER ORDER DATED 18/06/2018 IN IA.380/2018 IN COC.92/2018].
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anoop D
- respondent
Geetha P
Coram
Shaji P.Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court