A contempt case was reopened alleging non-compliance with prior directives. The court held that the directives were substantively complied with, therefore it was satisfied to drop the contempt proceedings and close the case.
The contempt case was closed as no reason existed for proceeding further given substantive compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/3RD BHADRA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 772 of 2017 (S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).28066/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE W.P(C):
CSI ALL SAINT'S CHURCH, CSI DIOCESE OF COCHIN, KALAMASSERY - 683 104, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & VICAR, REV. JACOB JOHN.
BY ADV. SRI. S. MUHAMMED HANEEFF
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.3 IN THE WP(C): -------------------------------------------
GEORGE A.J., (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRAFFIC POLICE EAST, KOCHI - 682 018.
*ADDL. 2ND RESPONDENT IMPLEADED:
SHRI. S. NARAYANAN (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KALAMASSERY-683104.
(ADDL. R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 21.08.2017 IN IA.528/2017 IN COC.772/2017)
R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.S. SHEEJA ADDL R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER,SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
EL
Con.Case(C).No. 772 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE AI A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DT.27.10.2016 IN WPC.5682/2015 ON THE FILES OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
EL
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C). No. 772 of 2017
Dated this the 9th day of April, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case was re-opened complaining that, the
directives contained in the judgment are not complied with fully,
as is undertaken.
the petitioner submitted that, the directives are substantively
complied with, however, there are certain foundation still remaining in the property in question, however, I am satisfied
that since the directives are complied with substantively, there is
no reason for proceeding with the contempt case any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/9/4/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has fully complied with the directives contained in the preceding order by October 27, 2016.
CSI All Saint's Church, CSI Diocese of Cochin
George A.J.
S. Narayanan
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
