Contempt case filed for non-compliance with a prior directive wherein counsel for the respondent submitted compliance had been effected, leading the court to record the submission and close the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 557 of 2018 IN WPC. 37161/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 37161/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-11-2017
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
THOMAS M V AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.CHACKO VARGHESE, MOOLAMKUZHIYIL HOUSE, 1000 ACRE, ADIMALY (INSPECTOR, KSRTC, RETIRED ON 31/5/2016, FROM MUNAR DEPOT, UNDER THE CONTROL OF ATO, KOTHAMANGALAM DEPOT)
BY ADV.SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT)
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1 N WP(C):
A.HEMACHANDRAN, I.P.S. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.
BY SHRI.T.P SAJAN, SC, KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-04-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 557 of 2018 IN WPC. 37161/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE AI: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.6.2016 ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.11.2017 IN WP(C) NO.37161/2017
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL ---------------------
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk/6/4/18
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
in
W.P.(C). No. 37161 of 2017
Dated this the 6th day of April, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the directive
contained in the judgment dated 20.11.2017 is not complied
with.
the respondent submitted that already the directives are complied with.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that
the same may be recorded and the contempt case may be closed.
Accordingly, submission made by the counsel is recorded
and the contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/6/4/
Thomas M V
A. Hemachandran, I.P.S.
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
