Petitioner filed contempt of court application alleging non-compliance of earlier orders in an associated writ petition. Court recorded satisfaction that the directives were complied with and closed the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 631 of 2018
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 2092/2018 DATED 08-02-2018)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P:
CHARLES MATHEW, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR, AGED 46,S/O.MATHEW, PALATHRA HOUSE, THURUTHY P.O, CHANGANACHERRY.
BY ADV.SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW
RESPONDENT/6TH RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.:
V.V.BINU, AGED NOT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PROJECT DIRECTOR, PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU), KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD, T.C.4/1654, MAYOORAM, BELHAVEN GARDENS, KOWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 003.
BY SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, SC,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-04-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts 13/4/2018
Con.Case(C).No. 631 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1 JUDGMENT DATED 08/02/2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.2092/2018. ANNEXURE 2 COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 14/03/2018 SEND BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE 3 COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPTS.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts 13/4/2018
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.631 of 2018
----------------------------------------------Dated this the 12th day of April, 2018
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that the directives contained in the judgement dated 8.2.2018 is not complied with.
for petitioner submitted that, the directives are complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 12.4.2018
Charles Mathew
V.V.Binu
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
