K.Anilkumar v. Jayasree
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line acknowledgment that a contempt case arising under a previous WPC was closed following the disposal of impugned proceedings, with liberty reserved to the petitioner for fresh proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to the petitioner to move appropriate proceedings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 26TH MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 212 of 2018 IN WPC. 23158/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23158/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-07-2017
PETITIONER(S):
K.ANILKUMAR, AGED 47,S/O.KUNJIKUTTA PANICKER,KAVANIYIL HOUSE, SOUTH PAMPADY,KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.S.NIDHEESH
RESPONDENT(S):
JAYASREE, W/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,NOW WORKING AS THE SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,NANTHENCODE,TRIVANDRUM-695003.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. ANILKUMAR
- respondent
JAYASREE
Coram
P.V. ASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court