K.S.Latheef v. Sivaraman
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the High Court closed the proceedings. The judge noted that the case can be closed given the nature of directions and counter affidavit, reserving the right for the petitioner to separately agitate any grievance regarding respondents' compliance.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to agiate separately if aggrieved by respondents' compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 2119 of 2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22334/2015 DATED 25-01-2016 ------------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC.
K.S.LATHEEF, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.SAYED MOHAMMED, FOUZIA MANZIL, ROSAPOOKANDAM, KUMILY VILLAGE PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.LIJU. M.P
RESPONDENTS/3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENT IN WPC.:
1. SIVARAMAN, AGE NOT KNOWN, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.H. SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THODUPUZHA EAST, IDUKKI-695 033.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.S.Latheef
- respondent
Sivaraman
- respondent
Assai.M.Lukose
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court