Bindumathi P.S v. Mr.Farooq a
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the court observed that both sides submitted that the directions in the connected writ petition were complied with, and closed the case accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1822 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22819/2012 DATED 14-07-2017
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
BINDUMATHI P.S., W/O.MANOJ P.KUMAR, AGED 46 YEARS, NON VOCATIONAL TEACHER,
SNM VOCATIONAL HIGER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VANNAPPURAM, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM SMT.NISHA GEORGE
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
MR.FAROOQ A.,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bindumathi P.S.
- respondent
Mr. Farooq A.
Coram
A.Muhammed Mustaque
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court