Disposed
Sunil Peter v. K.Hemachandran I.P.S
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/2085/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 26TH MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2085 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27923/2017 of THIS HON'BLE COURT .
------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P[C]
SUNIL PETER, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.P.P.PETER, PAREPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADAVATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM.686 010. (COACH BUILDER, KSRTC, KOTTAYAM, NOW WORKING AS VITHURA DEPOT).
BY ADVS.SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT) SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN W.P[C]:
K.HEMACHANDRAN I.P.S, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 023.
BY SHRI.T.P SAJAN, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-02-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
TS
Con.Case(C).No. 2085 of 2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE 1:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.8.2017 IN WPC.NO.27923/2017.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES - NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PS TO JUDGE
TS
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 2085 OF 2017
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the direction contained in the judgment in W.P.(C). No. 27923/2017, dated 23.08.2017 is not complied with. Today when the matter is taken up, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent has produced an order dated 29.01.2018 from where I am satisfied that the direction is complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.
Accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
DCS
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
SUNIL PETER
K HEMACHANDRAN IPS
SHAJI P Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court