Disposed
E.C.Satheesan v. Smt. Dr.M.Beena IAS
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/197/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 197 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34466/2014 OF THE HON'BLE COURT DATED 27-10-2016
PETITIONER:
E.C.SATHEESAN, CONVENER, COMTRUST WEAVING FACTORY WORKERS ACTION COMMITTEE, RESIDING AT PRESCEILLAM, CHEROOTTY ROAD, CALICUT-673032.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.MANU GOVIND SMT.B.MEERA
SRI.S.SABARINADH
RESPONDENT:
SMT. DR.M.BEENA IAS, WHOSE AGE AND NAME OF FATHER AND PLACE OF RESIDENCE ARE UNKNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NOW WORKING AS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, TC.XI/266, KESTON ROAD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695003,
BY SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-02-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PBS
Con.Case(C).No. 197 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2016 IN WRIT PETITION CIVIL NO. 34466/2014.
ANNEXURE A2 A TRUE COPY PHOTOCOPY OF THE CONTEMPT NOTICE DATED 01.01.2018 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
PBS 8/3/2018
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 197 OF 2018
Dated this the 26th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the direction contained in the judgment in W.P.(C). No. 34466/2014, dated 27.10.2016 is not complied with. Today when the matter is taken up, learned Standing Counsel submitted that the directions are complied with, which is fairly endorsed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.
The contempt of court case is closed, accordingly.
sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
DCS
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
E.C. Satheesan
Smt. Dr. M. Beena IAS
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court