Macmillan Pavianose v. Dinesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the petitioner alleged non-compliance with earlier directions. The respondent submitted that directions were complied with, a fact the petitioner also accepted. The court issued a per curiam order closing the proceedings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 196 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25296/2016 of THIS HON'BLE COURT .
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WP(C)
MACMILLAN PAVIANOSE, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O PAVIANOSE, JOSE VILLA, MARIYAPPALLY PO, NATTAKOM, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV.SRI.A.K.ALEX
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.4 IN WP(C):
DINESH KUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM, PIN.686001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Macmillan Pavianose
- respondent
Dinesh Kumar
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court