This contempt case came up for admission. Counsel for both sides submitted that the directions in the substantive judgment were complied with. The court accordingly closed the contempt case.
Contempt case closed as directions were complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1863 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 11765/2017 DATED 15-06-2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION
KADEEJA ADAMPULAN, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.C.V.AHAMMEDKUTTY, C.V.HOUSE, ARABIC TEACHER, WARDHA MODEL UP SCHOOL, KANNUR-3.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN
SMT.ATHIRA A.MENON
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
SURENDRAN KIZHAKKEVALAPPIL, ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR NORTH, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY Sr. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Hr..........
Con.Case(C).No. 1863 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO 11765/2017 DATED 15-06-2017.
ANNEXURE A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 30-06-2017.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
// TRUE COPY//
P.S TO JUDGE.
Hr.....
P.V.ASHA J.
-------------------------------------Contempt Case (Civil).No.1863 of 2017
--------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of February, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned counsels for both sides submit
that, the directions in the judgment is complied with.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
KADEEJA ADAMPULAN
SURENDRAN KIZHAKKEVALAPPIL
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
