V.Balu v. Dr.M.a.Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner submitted that directions in a previous judgment were complied with. The court accepted this submission and ordered the closure of the contempt case.
What did the court decide?
Contemning case closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 23RD MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 141 of 2018 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35980/2017 DATED 09-11-2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
V.BALU, S/O.VELUKUTTY, AGED 49, KIZHAKKETHIL VEEDU, TC 11/1559,YMR JUNCTION, NANTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV.SRI.M.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT
DR.M.A.LAL, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DIRECTOR, SIEMAT(STATE INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT & TRAINING),CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS, EAST FORT, ATTAKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 036.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Balu
- respondent
Dr.M.A.Lal
Coram
P.V.Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court