In a contempt of court case, the petitioner complained of non-compliance with a prior judgment. Upon hearing, counsel submitted that the direction was complied with. Consequently, the court concluded there was no need to pursue proceedings and closed the case.
Contempt of court proceedings closed and case dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 186 of 2018
---------------------------
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12073/2017 DATED 06-07-2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
K.M. BHAVA, S/O.K.B.MUHAMMED, AGED 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALLEPURATH HOUSE, VADACODE, PUTHIYA ROAD, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 021, (TECHNICIAN (RETIRED), MILMLA, TRIPUNITHURA).
BY ADV.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:
DR. MURALIDHARA DAS FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ERCMPU LTD (MILMA), EDAPPALLY P.O., COCHIN-682 024.
BY ADV.SMT.LATHA ANAND
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
Con.Case(C).No. 186 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE I : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.12073/2017 (H) DATED 6.7.2017.
ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 24.7.2017.
ANNEXURE III: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENTS OF POSTS, INDIA.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
09.03.2018.
mbr/
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 186 OF 2018
Dated this the 01st day of March, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the direction contained in the judgment in W.P.(C). No. 12073/2017, dated 06.07.2017 is not complied with. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the direction is complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.
The contempt of court case is closed, accordingly.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
DCS
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is in contempt of court for failing to comply with the judgment in W.P.(C). No. 12073/2017.
K.M. BHAVA
DR. MURALIDHARA DAS
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
