Rappai v. Dr.a.Kowsigan
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt case was disposed of when the respondent produced an order from the District Collector confirming belated compliance with directions in a prior W.P. judgment, satisfying the court.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed as the direction was found to be complied with, albeit belatedly.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1302 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4616/2017 of THIS HON'BLE COURT . ---------
PETITIONER(S)
RAPPAI, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.DEVASSY, KONIKKARA HOUSE, THRISSUR TALUK, OLLUR VILLAGE, OLLUR DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV.SRI.C.DHEERAJ RAJAN
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC:
DR.A.KOWSIGAN,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR- 680 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pursue contempt proceedings after the respondent's belated compliance with the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAPPAI
- respondent
DRAKOWSIGANDISTRICTCOLLECTOR
Coram
SHAJI P. CHALY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court