Court closed a contempt of court case pending against the petitioner, acknowledging that a judgment sought to be enforced has been stayed by a Division Bench.
Contempt of Court Case closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to initiate proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 149 of 2017 IN WPC. 25003/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25003/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 10-11-2016
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
SREENIVASAN T AGED 50, S/O. K.VELLAN, THATTANCHERY HOUSE, NANMINDA, BALUSSERY MUKKU, CALICUT, EMPANALLED CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THAMARASSERY UNIT. KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN SMT.T.RESHMA SRI.HARISANKAR N UNNI SMT.S.SIKKY
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
M.G.RAJAMANIKYAM MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695 039.
BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC 149/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 10.11.2016 IN W.P.(C) nO.25003/2015 ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DTD 29.12.2016
ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE B DTD 31.12.2016
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
VPS PS TO JUDGE
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Contempt Case (C) No.149 of 2018
Dated this the 21st day of March, 2018
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the judgment sought to be enforced has already been stayed by a Division Bench of this Court. In the light of the said development, this Contempt of Court Case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to initiate proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, if required at a later point of time.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
vps 23/3
/True Copy/
PS to Judge
Sreenivasan T
M.G. Rajamanikyam
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
