S.a.M.Sajjad v. Sri.G.R.Gokul I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 500 of 2018
THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.31774/2017 DATED 05-10-2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
S.A.M. SAJJAD, S/O. SAIYED NAIMATHULLA, AGED 47 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. HIGH LANDS COTTAGES LTD., OFFICE REGD. 5-B-107, 1ST FLOOR, NAMPILLY STATION ROAD, HYDERABAD, RESIDING AT NO. 16/3/990, FLAT NO. 101, SKILL ASHYAL MALAKPET, HYDERABAD- 500 024.
BY SRI.K.JAJU BABU, SENIOR ADVOCATE. ADVS. SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN, SMT.ELIZABETH ANTONY.
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT :
SRI.G.R. GOKUL I.A.S., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT -685 603.
BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.P. PRADEEP.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs. 23/03/2018.
Con.Case(C).No. 500 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
| ANNEXURE A | COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 07/02/2014 IN W.P.(C)NO.20514/2007 AND CRL.MC. NO.1881/2008 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE B | COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A2-3055/07 DATED 18/08/2014 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C)NO.31774/2017. |
| ANNEXURE C | COPY OF THE APPEAL (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER FIRM BEFORE THE RESPONDENT ON 20/10/2014. |
| ANNEXURE D | CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05/10/2017 IN W.P.(C)NO.31774/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. |
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs. 23/03/2018.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Contempt Case (C) No. 500 of 2018
Dated this the 20th day of March, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the direction contained in the judgment has been complied with. In the light of the submission made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
vps 21/3
/True Copy/
PS to Judge
S.A.M. Sajjad
G.R. Gokul
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court