Kanaran K v. Sri.Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt case alleging non-compliance with a previous judgment. The Court found the direction complied with, closed the proceedings, and no further pursuit was warranted.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings closed as the prior direction was found to be complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 19TH MAGHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 148 of 2018 ----------------------THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.34591/2017 DATED 30-10-2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:-
KANARAN.K., AGED 49, S/O.CHEKKOOTTY, 10/200, KUMUTHULLATHIL HOUSE, AROOR P.O., PURAMERI, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV.SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:-:
SRI.SURESH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER CUM SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IN CHARGE, VATAKARA-673 101.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.VINITHA. B.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kananan K
- respondent
Suresh
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court