I.v.Sinesh v. Dr.Usha Titus
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY,THE 05TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 14TH BHADRA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1105 of 2017 IN WP(C). 5837/2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 5837/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-02-2017
PETITIONER/S:
I.V.SINESH
AGED 30 YEARS, SON OF VINCENT PHYSICAL EDUCATIN TEACHER(HIGH SCHOOL SECTION), ST. XAVIER'S HIGH SCHOOL, PEYAD, P.O,PALLIMUKKU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695573.
BY ADVS. SRI. V.A. MUHAMMED SRI. V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 DR.USHA TITUS IAS,AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2 FR. JOSEPH ANIL AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CORPORATE MANAGER, CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF LATIN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS DIOCESE OF NEYYATTINKARA, P.O NEYYATTINKARA - 695 921. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI. R.T. PRADEEP
OTHER PRESENT:
GP- SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1105 of 2017 IN WP(C). 5837/2017
JUDGEMENT
Learned government Pleader submits that, orders have already been passed on 07/07/2007, pursuant to Annexure 1 judgment. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the second respondent did not comply with the order and petitioner was allowed to continue only in the U.P section. According to the learned counsel for the second respondent, the order passed by the government is under challenge in WPC No.22968/2017. The Contempt Case has come up for further hearing only today after notice was issued to the respondents on 04/7/2017.
In view of the subsequent developments, when another writ petition is pending consideration of this court, I am of the view that the petitioner will be free to raise all his contentions in the writ petition which is pending. Contempt case is accordingly closed.
Sd/P.V.ASHA
Judge
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE I : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C NO.5837/2017-D DATED 21.02.2017
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
msp
I.V.SINESH
DR.USHA TITUS IAS
FR. JOSEPH ANIL
P.V.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court