The High Court of Kerala dismissed an anticipatory bail application considering the serious injury (fracture) to the informant and cogent prima facie evidence linking the petitioner to the assault under IPC sections 326 and 341.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed; the applicant was directed to surrender and seek regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 27TH BHADRA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 5306 of 2018
CRIME NO.257/2018 OF NATTUKAL POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED:
MAHAROOF M @ MANGADAN, AGED 32, NATTUKAL, PALAKKAD DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL)
RESPONDENT:
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.AJITH MURALI
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.5306 of 2018 2
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
B.A.5306 of 2018
3
linking the applicant with the Crime. In that view of the matter, I find no reason to allow this application.
This application is dismissed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE
DSV/18/9/18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in view of cogent materials linking the first accused with the fracture case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Maharoor M @ Mangadan
The State of Kerala
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
