Arun K. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of this writ petition, finding that the apprehension of the petitioner regarding lapse of funds for canal repairs was misplaced as the work must be completed per schedule.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stands disposed of based on the statement of the Learned Government Pleader.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2017/30TH PHALGUNA, 1938
WP(C).No. 7448 of 2017 (S)
PETITIONER :
ARUN K., ARUN SADANAM, THAMARAKUDY P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR
RESPONDENTS :
- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
- THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, AMBALAMUKKU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arun K.
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
S.Soman Nair
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court