Mony v.Athukuzhy v. District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/16TH SRAVANA, 1939
WP(C).No. 19791 of 2017 (Y)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
MONY V. ATHUKUZHY, AGED 53, S/O.VARGHESE, ATHUKUZHY HOUSE, MANEED.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,PIN-686 664.
BY ADVS.SRI.PRAMOD KOCHUTHOMMEN.E. SRI. TASON VENGATTU JOHNY
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,PIN-686 002.
2. DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM, PARK VIEW, OPPOSITE TO MUSEUMS COMPOUND, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 033.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mony V. Athukuzhy
- respondent
District Collector
- respondent
Director
- respondent
Kitco Limited
- respondent
Chief Executive Officer & Secretary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court