Nabeesa v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted the permission and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn by permission of the court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/17TH KARTHIKA, 1939
WP(C).No. 16318 of 2014 (L)
PETITIONER(S) :
NABEESA, THURUTHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAMARASSERY, CHERNALLOOR, ERNAKULAM.
BY SMT.SUMATHI DANDAPANI (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.RILGIN V.GEORGE SMT.LINTA VARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nabeesa
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
District Collector, Ernakulam
- respondent
Village Officer, Edapilly South Village
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court