Sajeevkumar T.V. v. the District Collector, Malappuram
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a building's intended religious use was closed after the fourth respondent clarified it is not for religious purposes, redressing the petitioners' grievance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/16TH KARTHIKA, 1939
WP(C).No. 4012 of 2017 (B)
PETITIONER(S):
1. SAJEEVKUMAR T.V.,
- S/O VELAYUDHAN T.V, KOORKKAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, CHELAMBRA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. RAJEESH. A.,
SON OF VELAYUDHAN. A, "PUSHPANJALI, KOORKKAMPARAMBIL HOUSE,
CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, CHELAMBRA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
3. RAJAN. M.,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dispute regarding the use of a building for religious purposes warrants continued judicial intervention after the respondent clarified its use.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sajeevkumar T.V.
- petitioner
Rajesh. A.
- petitioner
Rajan. M.
- petitioner
Ganesh T.V.
- respondent
The District Collector, Malappuram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court