The High Court of Kerala, as a terminal order, dismissed W.P.(C).No.1271 of 2012 as infructuous because the third respondent had retired from service.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to retirement of the third respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2017/20TH ASHADHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 1271 of 2012 (H)
PETITIONER(S):
THE MANAGER,
S.M.H.S.S. PATHARAM, SOORANAD SOUTH, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD, SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT (FINANCE INSPECTION NON TECHNICAL WING), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. R. SADASIVAN PILLAI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SADASIVA VILASOM, EDAKKAD P.O., SOORANAD, KOLLAM-691 552.
R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.PRINCY XAVIER. R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
W.P.(C).No.1271/2012
Dated this the 11th Day of July, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 3rd respondent has retired from service and the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ms
\true copy//
P.S to Judge
THE MANAGER, S.M.H.S.S. PATHARAM, SOORANAD SOUTH, KOLLAM.
STATE OF KERALA, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
R. SADASIVAN PILLAI
AMUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
