Rehna Rehman v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
This court held that petitioners initially appointed as teachers with salary approval should not be debited for service periods based on audit objections. The court directed reconsideration of the matter after a proper hearing of all affected parties.
What did the court decide?
Court directed reconsideration of the matter after hearing all parties and directed that recovery shall not be effected during the period prior to hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2017/20TH ASHADHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 11161 of 2010 (U)
PETITIONERS :
-----------
1. REHNA REHMAN MULACKAL LPS,KOLLAM),'PULLOTTIL VEEDU", MIDAPPALLY,, EDAPPALLY KOTTA,KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2. RADHAMANI.S,(WORKING AS LPSA IN MULACKAL LPS,KOLLAM),RAJESH BHAVANAM,MULLICKALA, THEVALAKKARA,KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.K.SATHYANATHAN
SRI.P.V.DILEEP
RESPONDENTS :
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners were entitled to salary and recovery from salary given initial approval of their appointments.
Whether the petitioners were given a reasonable opportunity of hearing before stopping their salary.
Whether the lower authority should reconsider the matter affecting the petitioners and other parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
REHNA REHMAN MULACKAL
- petitioner
RADHAMANI.S
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court