Baburaj.N.v v. the Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed the writ petition as infructuous due to the complete payment of the stay bond amount to the respondent company.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/11TH ASWINA, 1939
WP(C).No. 12374 of 2017 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
1. BABURAJ. N.V, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. VELU, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. INDIAN JEWELLERY, SHIGA APARTMENTS, EAST NADAKKAVU P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 011.
2. MRS.RATNALATHA N.V., W/O. BABURAJ N.V., SHIGA APARTMENTS, EAST NADAKKAVU P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 011.
BY ADVS.SRI.NIRMAL. S. SMT.VEENA HARI.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, (CHIEF MANAGER KOZHIKODE REGION), REGIONAL OFFICE, SOUTH INDIAN BANK, HAPPY TOWERS, KOZHIKODE-673 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Baburaj. N.V
- petitioner
Mrs.Ratnalatha N.V.
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, South Indian Bank
- respondent
M/s. Phoenix Arc Private Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court