Single judge of the Kerala High Court dismissed a review petition challenging a prior judgment in a writ petition, finding no grounds for review as the petitioner did not claim subsequent modification of impugned orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/11TH ASWINA, 1939
RP.No. 674 of 2017 (I)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27683/2016 DATED 14-12-2016
REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION:
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC, KERALA WATER AU
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN WPC:
PRADEEPAN P.N., AGED 57 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN, PADINJAROOT HOUSE, THANDILAM, VELLATTANJUR P.O., 680 601, HEAD OPERATOR (RETD), P.H. SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, GURUVAYOOR.
BY SRI.M.R.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-10-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sdr/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
R.P.No.674 of 2017
in
W.P.(C) No.27683 of 2016
O R D E R
On a perusal of the averments in the Review Petition, I do not find any ground made out for a review of the judgment dated 14.12.2016, more so when it is not the case of the review petitioner, even today, that Exts.P3 and P5 orders have been modified through any subsequent order. Accordingly, the Review
Petition fails, and is accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
sm/
Kerala Water Authority Represented by the Managing Director Jalabhan Thiruvananthapuram-695 001
Pradeepan P.N.
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
