The writ appeal was dismissed as not pressed in view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant. No substantive legal propositions were considered or decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2017/23RD ASHADHA, 1939
WA.No. 799 of 2017 () IN WP(C).3118/2017
-----------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 3118/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15-02-2017
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
JOSE K.MATHEW S/O.K.J.MATHEW, KILIROOPARAMBIL HOUSE, PADICHIRA P.O. SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.R.GITHESH SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1.DHANALAXMI BANK LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, C.M.MATHEW BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, RAM MOHAN ROAD, KOZHIKODE-673004
2.DHANALAXMI BANK LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KALPETTA BRANCH, KALPETTA P.O. WAYANAD-673121.
R1-R2 BY SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN,SC
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
VPS
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, C.J. & RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., J.
W.A. No.799 OF 2017 & I.A. No.874 of 2017
--------------------------------------------------Dated this the 14th day of July, 2017
JUDGMENT
Navaniti Prasad Singh, C.J.
In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the
appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., JUDGE
vps
Jose K. Mathew
Dhanalaxmi Bank Ltd
Navaniti Prasad Singh
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
