D.Manuvel v. P.P.Abdul Azeez
Case brief
What is this about?
Division Bench of this Court overruled a contra decision and held that a composite appeal is maintainable despite previous contrary rulings, remitting the matter for fresh consideration on merits.
What did the court decide?
A.S.No.14/2010 allowed, impugned judgment set aside, matter remitted for fresh disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/25TH JYAISHTA, 1939
RSA.No. 894 of 2016 (F)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 14/2010 of I ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 233/2008 of I ADDL.MUNSIFF'S COURT, TRIVANDRUM
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT IN THE FIRST APPEAL/PLAINTIFF IN THE ORIGINAL SUIT:
D.MANUVEL S/O. DEVADASAN, AGED 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT J.J.BHAVAN, NEAR NARMADA JUNCTION, CHEMPAZHANTHI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 522.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.BALACHANDRAN (KULASEKHARAM) SRI.V.R.GOPU
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN THE FIRST APPEAL/DEFENDANT IN THE ORIGINAL SUIT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether a composite appeal is maintainable against dismissal of the suit and counter claim decree
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D.MANUVEL S/O. DEVADASAN
- respondent
P.P.ABDUL AZEEZ
Coram
B. KEMAL PASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court