Omana v. Alex Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
In this regular second appeal, the High Court of Kerala dismissed the appeal against the lower appellate court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of a promissory note. The court upheld the dismissal of the suit for money realization.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed, closing pending interlocutory applications.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/20TH POUSHA, 1938
RSA.No. 822 of 2016 (F)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 10-04-2015 IN AS.357/2009 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, PALA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE TDATED 28-02-2009 IN OS.89/2000 of SUB COURT, PALA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
OMANA, AGED 61 YEARS W/O. SEBASTIAN, KAPPIL PARAMBIL HOUSE LALAM KARA, LALAM VILLAGE NOW RESIDING AT EDAPPADY KARA, BHARANANGANAM, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DIST.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABY THOMAS
SRI.K.D.ZACHARIAS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower appellate court was justified in reversing the trial court's finding and dismissing the suit for non-proof of execution of the promissory note.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Omana
- respondent
Alex Joseph
Coram
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court