Prabha v. Sureshkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal filed by appellant against eviction and property declaration decree. Dismissed as appellant had vacated premises during pendency, rendering eviction question non-arising. Compensation quantum not contested.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed; parties to bear respective costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/14TH MAGHA, 1938
RSA.No. 807 of 2010 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08-04-2010 IN AS 55/2009 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-II, MAVELIKKARA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-11-2008 IN OS 265/2005 of MUNSIFF COURT, HARIPAD
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFEDANT:
PRABHA, 45 YEARS D/O.THANKAMMA, HARE KRISHNA, MUTHUKULAM VAEAKKUM MURI, CHOOLATHERUVU.P.O., MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.RAJEEV KUMAR
SRI.B.RENJITH KUMAR
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
PRABHA
- respondent
SURESH KUMAR
Coram
B.KEMAL PASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court