P.Yooseph v. B.Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal regarding a suit for declaration and injunction over property transferred via alleged
What did the court decide?
Second appeal allowed; lower judgments set aside; suit remitted to trial court for fresh disposal with direction to examine documents via handwriting test.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/14TH MAGHA, 1938
RSA.No. 103 of 2014 ()
AS 200/2006 of III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
IN OS 1390/2004 of I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF’S COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
P.YOOSEPH, S/O.PEERUMOHAMMED, T.C.6/446, PUTHUVALAVILAKOM, PUTHENVEEDU (CHAITHRAM), VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1,2 & 3:
1. B.RAJENDRAN, S/O.BHARATHAN, SANTHI BHAVAN, THEEPPUKALMURI, POOLANTHARA, KOLIAKKODU VILLAGE AND P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 607.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether documents signed as sale deeds were intended as mere security for loan repayment.
Whether the trial courts erred by failing to order handwriting examination on disputed letters.
What relief to grant when procedural lapses in lower courts warrant fresh disposal of the suit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P. YOSEPH
- respondent
B. RAJENDRAN
- respondent
THULASEEDHARAN
- respondent
N.S. JUGUNUKUMAR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court