Thankamma v. Rajan Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant was called upon to press a regular second appeal; contentions were made that the appeal was not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Discarded as not pressed by the appellant; interlocutory applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/17TH JYAISHTA, 1939
RSA.No. 1251 of 2016 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-07-2016 IN AS 92/2010 of SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25-03-2010 IN OS 74/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
THANKAMMA,
AGED 73 YEARS, D/O. KARTHIAYANI AMMA, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKEKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, KAREEPRA MURI, KOTTARAKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THANKAMMA
- respondent
RAJAN PILLAI
- respondent
TALUK SURVEYOR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court