Baby v. Jayanth
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a regular second appeal (RSA No. 1320 of 2013) as not pressed by the appellant, with no substantive reasoning provided in the order.
What did the court decide?
The regular second appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2017/11TH JYAISHTA, 1939
RSA.No. 1320 of 2013 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.07.2013 IN AS 58/2012 of DISTRICT COURT,THODUPUZHA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.03.2012 IN OS 285/2007 of MUNSIFF COURT, THODUPUZHA
APPELLANT/1ST APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT:
BABY, S/O.KURIAKOSE, AGED 69 YEARS, MARAMKANDATHIL HOUSE, UDUMBANNOOR KARA, UDUMBANNOOR VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT MANNAMKANDAHIL, CHITTILAMCHERI KARA, CHITTILAMCHERI VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.SAJU.S.A SRI.T.SIVADASAN SMT.P.A.SHEEJA SMT.MEENA.A. SRI.K.C.KIRAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS & 2ND APPELLANT/PLAINTIFFS AND 2ND DEFENDANT:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Baby, s/o. Kuriakose
- respondent
Jayanth, s/o. Jacob
- respondent
Manju, w/o. Sunny
- respondent
Jaison, s/o. John
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court