In this review petition, the High Court of Kerala dismissed the application seeking review of a judgment that examined the legality of powers exercised by the Additional District Magistrate.
Review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/13TH ASWINA, 1939
RP.No. 749 of 2017 (E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19648/2017 DATED 20-07-2017
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS IN W.P.(C):
1. PONNAMMA VARGHESE,
2. MANJU ROSE,
BY ADVS.SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SMT.V.DEEPA SMT.N.G.SINDHU
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PATHANAMTHITTA.689 645
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PATHANAMTHITTA.689 645
4. THE THAHASILDAR, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 689 645
5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 689 645
RP.No. 749 of 2017 (E)
6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-691523.
7. MATHEW VEERAPPALLY, VEERAPPALLY VEEDU, PANNIVIZHA VEEDU, ADOOR VILLAGE, ADOOR THALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 689 645
R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GEORGE MATHEW VADAKKEL R6 BY SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL BY SRI.V.V.BINU, SC, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD L
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sdr/-
RP.No. 749 of 2017 (E)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 25.05.2017 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT
ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED NIL UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 09-08-2017
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
sdr/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
R.P. No. 749 of 2017
in W.P.(C). No. 19648 of 2017
===================================================== Dated this the 5th day of October, 2017
ORDER
On a perusal of the averments in the review petition, I am not persuaded to review the judgment dated 20.07.2017, which was rendered while examining the legality of exercise of powers by the Additional District Magistrate, under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act. The review petition, therefore, fails and is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
das/ 06.10.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Review Petition praying for review of the judgment dated 20.07.2017 is maintainable under the circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ponnamma Varghese
Manju Rose
State of Kerala
Mathew Veerappally
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
