Disposed
Dalas Varghese v. Mr. T.K.Vineeth
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1701/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/13TH ASWINA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1701 of 2017 (S) -------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).34550/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
DALAS VARGHESE, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O MATHEW VARGHESE, CHACKKALAMOOLAYIL HOUSE, KUSUMAGIRI P.O., KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682 203.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.B.SANDEEP
SMT.R.PRIYA SRI.B.SURJITH SMT.R.ANJANA
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
MR. T.K.VINEETH, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN:682001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
EL
Con.Case(C).No. 1701 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURE
A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 10.4.2017 IN WPC.34550/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
A2 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 20.4.2017
A3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
A4 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST LETTER SENT TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DATED 25.4.2017
A7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KOCHI DATED 13.7.2017
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
EL
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
............................................................. Contempt Case (C).No.1701 Of 2017 ............................................................. Dated this the 5th day of October, 2017
J U D G M E N T
On going through the averments in the contempt of court case, I do not find any contumacious conduct on behalf of the respondent to maintain a contempt of court case. The contempt of court case is therefore closed.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
mns/05.10.17
DALAS VARGHESE
MR. T.K.VINEETH
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court