Review petition allowing modification of order where writ injunction was mistakenly issued to fifth respondent instead of competent third respondent regarding mutation application. Directions issued for action within one month.
Judgment in writ petition modified directing third respondent to pass orders on petitioner's Ext.P1 application within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/17TH SRAVANA, 1939
RP.No. 707 of 2017 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.23040/2017 DATED 13/07/2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SMT. SUJASREE, D/O. THULASIBAI, AGED 50, RESIDENT OF TC 27/1763-1, GURUKRIPA, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.K.VIJAYAN, SRI.S.SURESH, SRI.K.R.RAJESHKUMAR, SRI.G.RANJU MOHAN.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION ROAD, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 043.
2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, EAST FORT-695 023.
3. ADDL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, EAST FORT-695 023.
4. TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, EAST FORT-695 023.
5. VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, KAMALESHWARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 009.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.J. MANURAJ.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
===================
R.P. No. 707 of 2017
in
W.P.(C.) No.23040 of 2017
Dated this the 8th day of August, 2017
O R D E R
The petitioner seeks review of the judgment. The parties and documents are referred to in this order as they appear in the writ petition.
R.P. No.707/2017 in W.P.(C) No. 23040/2017
2
third respondent is the competent authority to take a decision on Ext.P1 application. Hence, this review petition.
also the learned Government Pleader.
In the said circumstances, the review petition is allowed and the judgment in the writ petition is modified directing the third respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1 application preferred by the petitioner. Needless to say, the direction aforesaid shall be complied with, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/-
SKS
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Smt. Suhasree
District Collector
Tahsildar
Addl Tahsildar
Taluk Surveyor
Village Officer
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
